|
Lesson Plan: Analyzing
the Relationship between Snowpack and River Flow
Subject: Earth and Space Science / Hydrology
/ Water Cycle
Classtime: Total:3-5 days
- Collect and analyze historical data from Internet sites
Grade Level: 6-12
Materials/Technology: Per group:
- USGS topographic map in the 1:24,000 scale for the river basin of study
- computer with Internet access
- graph paper
- data collection notebook
- Netscape 3.01 browser (or higher) for viewing maps
Safety, Handling, Disposal:
Close supervision is strongly recommended when students are conducting
searches on the Internet. Inappropriate sites are easy to access either
by mistake or on purpose.
Learner Outcomes:
Students should be able to:
- Read and interpret a topographical map.
- Collect data and correctly construct a graph.
- Increase awareness of the dynamics of the hydrosphere in their surroundings.
- Increase skills and discipline associated with data collection and
interpretation.
- Appreciate the variables a scientist needs to consider when making
informed predictions.
- Have some exposure to occupational opportunities in science related
fields.
Problem/Purpose:
Study the relationship between mountain snowpack and river flow.
Background/Inquiry:
For the teacher from the author: This activity provides an opportunity
for students to work with subject matter "relevant to their communities"
and close enough to their own experience to be meaningful. This is a direct
opportunity for students to experience science in the world around them
and to make scientifically informed predictions based on the real data which
they "collect". This is a challenging activity that uses "technology
as a tool of inquiry". This activity will end itself well to either
an individual or a team effort. URL´s are inserted in the lesson so
that the students will be provided with enough structure and guidance to
guarantee their success. "Snotel site" is a location in the
mountains where accumulated snowfall or "snowpack" is monitored
by telemetry. Information is collected using electronic instruments on
a daily basis and transmitted to the NRCS data collection center in Portland,
Oregon. This information is available to the public on the Internet.
Vocabulary List: Here.
Hypothesis:
Example: There is a strong relationship between high snowpack and high river flow.
Procedure:
Each group does the following:
- Obtain a USGS topographic map in the 1:24,000 scale for the local
river basin that you are studying.
- Mark the boundary of the watershed for the river of study on the map.
Maps can be obtained at outdoor stores, the USGS or possibly from a
college, university or public library in your area (copies should be
made if maps are obtained from these sources): http://water.montana.edu/watersheds2/groups/UDBrowseGroups.asp
(Maps of watersheds can be downloaded from this web site).
- Locate the river gauging stations on your map and the Snotel sites
for the watershed. Pick a gauging station on the river of your choice.
Gauging Stations:
Snotel Sites:
- Pick one or two Snotel sites. These sites are historical data that
will provide a basis for predicting future runoff. Identify sites that
provide representative information for the watershed. Current conditions
and historical data are available for each site.
- Gather historical data on both your Snotel sites and your gauging
station along the river into a data table spanning ten years.
- Create a graph representing the past 10 years of peak flow at your
river gauging station.
- Create a graph that shows the maximum accumulation of snow at your
Snotel sites over the past 10 years.
Graph:
Stream Data:
Results/Analysis:
Have students approximate the date when snowpack reaches its peak.
Make note of the date when high water reaches your station each year.
Average date of high water __________.
Average peak snow data __________.
Compare the data and see if there is a correlation between the snowpack
and river flows.
Are there years when the snow pack is comparable and the river flows
are dramatically different?
Conclusions:
What conditions are variables that could explain the lack of correlation
between snowpack and runoff?
How could this activity be used to predict a future river flow?
What variables might make predicting future river flow a difficult task?
Assessments: (if included)
Integration: (if included)
This activity integrates technology (the Internet), writing skills, data
organization, and prediction making with the water cycle and the water
storage function of snowpack.
Reflections: Share your thoughts on this lesson with the NTEN team.
Please send an e-mail to Patti Harrison.
Extensions: (if included)
OPTIONAL ACTIVITIES:
Use the ten-year historical data to make a prediction of a future river
flow based on current records.
Visit your Snotel site (you may need x-country skis!).
Visit your river gauging station.
Meet with a representative of the USFS of USGS who can explain the features
of the data collection stations.
When you are planning a ski trip, check the snowpack data to be sure
that the rocks are covered.
Note to students: If one of the URL addresses above will not work, try
eliminating information after the"/s". This will get you to the
home page and you can navigate through the site from there.
References/Resources: (if
included)

Credits
Contributing Teacher: Robert Beese
NTEN Course: K-12 Earth Science
Instructor: Jerry Nelson
Assistant Instructor: Bill Ochs
Developing Team:
T.L. Buck Buchanan, Cathy Hensel, Patti Harrison, John Usher, Don Wilson
HTML Programmers: Christy Cousineau,
John Usher, Ching-Kwong Chia
Copyright © 1998 - 2002, National Teachers
Enhancement Network
Comments: pattih@montana.edu


Up to Top
|